Home arrow Forums arrow Your Union arrow Ontario Loblaw workers vote 97% for strike mandate

Ontario Loblaw workers vote 97% for strike mandate

page: prev  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  next
Display posts from previous:
Author Message
ross53
Post Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 12:59 am

Joined: 24 May 2006
Posts: 1434
Location: california
SharynS wrote:
Taking 30,000 members out on strike is going to hit the dues kitty and defense fund fairly hard.


Unless the union, have a huge strike fund.

I don’t know anything about “Canada Labor Law” what I know is that in California after the 2003/2004 strike ended, UFCW local 135 requested and obtained back dues from all of the members. In other words after the inept union leaders and the greedy corporate baron drove the membership/workers into financial ruins, California Law allowed the union to inflict addition pain and suffering by black mailing the membership,pay the local your past dues or we will deprive you of your job.

At the end of the strike, the union recuperated all of their “temporary” lost revenues,
The grocery reduced labor cost, by reducing our accrued pension by 33% and created a two tier pay system…..and the workers got F*****!


And finally the UFCW declare “VICTORY”… salary and benefits increased for our union officials while, the new hire workers became a second class citizen “Union members with government assistance”.

BTW; 70,000 workers went on strike in Southern California in 2003/2004

_________________
" I always wondered why somebody doesn't do something about that. Then I realized I was somebody" Lilly Tomlin.
Back to top profile :: pm :: www
John Briley
Post Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 2:55 pm

Joined: 21 Nov 2007
Posts: 616
Press Release:

Loblaw Companies Limited Reports Second Quarter 2010 results.

http://micro.newswire.ca/release.cgi?rkey=1807224857&view=62151-0&Start=0&htm=0
Back to top profile :: pm
silverboy
Post Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 7:35 pm

Joined: 13 Feb 2006
Posts: 50
Location: North America
wm pasz wrote:

Several years ago we dug up an fascinating secret agreement (called a "Partnering Agreement") between the UFCW and these chains - in which the UFCW agrees that that contract expiry dates at unionized stores will be staggered such that "not more than one store in any region or sector is vulnerable to strike action at any time." Given this agreement, it doesn't really matter how many workers want to strike, what their issues are or how obstinate the company is being at negotiations. Not more than one location can be out at the same time. While a multi-location strike can have dire implications for a company in the retail business, a strike at one out of a dozen is a drop in the bucket. The collective strength of the workers is reduced to something close to zero.

These guys have made a science out of sell-outs.


Is this agreement real?
Where is it?
Who can access it?
Is it still valid?
Something we can read too if it was dug up...?
Back to top profile :: pm
wm pasz
Post Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 3:17 pm

Joined: 29 Jan 2006
Posts: 1219
Location: Toronto
We wrote about the secret partnering agreement on our previous web site. Excerpts from it were contained in this OLRB decision. You have no way of knowing if this deal is still in effect. Suffice to say that any union sleazy enough to entertain such an agreement is not one that I would expect would go to bat for its members.

_________________
Time is on the side of the oppressed today, it's against the oppressor. Truth is on the side of the oppressed today, it's against the oppressor. You don't need anything else. - Malcolm X
Back to top profile :: pm :: www
John Briley
Post Posted: Sat Jul 24, 2010 4:11 pm

Joined: 21 Nov 2007
Posts: 616
I just ran across this article in Supermarket News concerning our discussion.

Loblaw Sees 'Watershed' in Union Talks

http://supermarketnews.com/news/loblaw_watershed_0723/

By Mark Hamstra

July 23, 2010
Back to top profile :: pm
John Briley
Post Posted: Sat Jul 24, 2010 5:21 pm

Joined: 21 Nov 2007
Posts: 616
To follow up up on another Supermarket News article regarding SN's Top 75 Retailers for 2010, check out the #6 rating for Loblaw Cos.

http://supermarketnews.com/profiles/top75/2010/index.html

Additionaly, out here in Northern California, check out the ratings for three (3) of our largest Union Employers.

#5... Safeway

#29 ...Savemart Supermarkets

#39 ... Raley's Supermarkets
Back to top profile :: pm
John Briley
Post Posted: Sat Jul 24, 2010 5:51 pm

Joined: 21 Nov 2007
Posts: 616
Quote:
“I like being the best payer in the industry, but I also want to give the best customer service, and to give the best customer service we’ve got to have the flexibility that allows us to put the right people in the right place at the right time,” said Allan Leighton, Loblaw’s president and deputy chairman. “And there is a watershed in this industry — there are more non-unionized players than unionized players, and therefore, it’s time for a change. Now my objective and the objective of the negotiating team is to negotiate that.”



What I find interesting is Loblaw's President, Allan Leighton's "allegation" that there are more "non-unionized players" than "unionized players" and that "its time for a change"!

So...... "if" Loblaw Cos. is "allegedly" having trouble / difficulty competing with their non-union competition, then someone please explain to me how they can pull down a #6 rating out of the top 75 retailers for 2010????
Back to top profile :: pm
Bill Sable
Post Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 3:25 am

Joined: 14 Feb 2009
Posts: 259
The Loblaw fellow does not know his history...the "watershed" was in 1985 with the introduction of two-tiers into our industry, jobs and unions.

Everything since has followed as a logical consequence of this malignant decision.

As for "improving" customer service, the gentleman's contention is clearly nonsense to anyone who has ever set foot in a grocery store.

On the other hand, corporate folks are the one's who require that self-checkout operations be closed at 9 PM just as the only (read: young and technologically unintimidated) clientele comes in to shop and at the same time that corporate security mandates that only two (2) registers be functional.

Go figure. Confused
Back to top profile :: pm
wm pasz
Post Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 3:38 am

Joined: 29 Jan 2006
Posts: 1219
Location: Toronto
Oh there are for sure more non-union players in the Canadian grocery industry than there were 20 years ago. The UFCW and Loblaws have their partnership to thank for that development. Thanks to their continuous ratcheting down of wages, benefits and working conditions, it's possible now for non-union players to open up shop in Canada and never have to worry about their staff joining a union. All they have to do is show them a copy of the UFCW's great feats of bargaining and the workers will quickly cotton on to the fact that they'll earn more money without a union.

As far back as 2003, Wal-mart was paying more than Loblaws unionized Real Canadian Superstores (UFCW mandarins went ape-shit when we let that cat out of the bag) and providing better benefits that were accessible sooner. The other non-union competitors can claim that their workers too make more than their counterparts in UFCW-represented shops. Even if they earn minimum wage, they are spared the dues and initiation fee deductions that can easily eat up a good chunk of a part-timer's pay check.

The UFCW's partnering with employers has actually made it easier for non-union competitors to set up shop and they have. The Loblaw fellow's comments signal that a deal is nigh. Watch for vague talk about "change" at the forthcoming ratification meetings. These guys had such a golden opportunity and they completely pissed it away.

_________________
Time is on the side of the oppressed today, it's against the oppressor. Truth is on the side of the oppressed today, it's against the oppressor. You don't need anything else. - Malcolm X
Back to top profile :: pm :: www
John Briley
Post Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 4:12 am

Joined: 21 Nov 2007
Posts: 616
The following taken from UFCW 1000A Website:
http://www.ufcw1000a.ca/

Quote:
Contract Talks Continue Between UFCW Canada and Loblaw

July 23, 2010

Negotiations aimed at reaching a new collective agreement for 30,000 unionized Ontario workers at stores owned by Loblaw Companies Ltd. adjourned after a four-day bargaining session in Niagara Falls. The workers are represented by UFCW Canada local unions 1977, 1000A and 175 & 633.

Talks involving the full bargaining committees of both parties are scheduled to resume on August 9, 2010.

Earlier this month, the workers voted by more than 97 per cent to give their union a strike mandate. The union has said, however, that it will stay at the bargaining table as long as progress is being made towards a settlement.

Listen to President Corporon’s latest message to the members.

Check out news, updates and what workers are saying at www.groceryworkersunited.ca


Back to top profile :: pm
wm pasz
Post Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 1:02 pm

Joined: 29 Jan 2006
Posts: 1219
Location: Toronto
Gee what an uplifting message from Pres Corporon. Kinda makes you want to run out and watch paint dry. I wonder what kind of deal is being hatched behind closed doors? My bet is that it will look a lot like the blockbuster Kevin and the boys brought home in 2006 - all $36 million of it.

The message on the www.groceryworkersunited.ca is filled with irony: Wages Cut, Benefits Slashed, Respect Gone reminds me of a series we did a few years ago.

Wages of Hypocrisy
Benefits of Hypocrisy
Weasel Words to Live By

Here's the one that got the UFCW mis_leaders all hot and bothered: The Cat's Outta the Bag

No one should be at all surprised that there isn't going to be a strike and that there is going to be another sell-out. If you follow the UFCW down memory lane, you'll see the same pattern repeating itself since the early 1990's when UFCW Canadian bigshots realized they could trade contract concessions for huge contributions to their pension fund (which a buddy was looting) and other secret funds.

_________________
Time is on the side of the oppressed today, it's against the oppressor. Truth is on the side of the oppressed today, it's against the oppressor. You don't need anything else. - Malcolm X
Back to top profile :: pm :: www
John Briley
Post Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 12:19 am

Joined: 21 Nov 2007
Posts: 616
The following taken directly from the UFCW Local 175 & 633 website:

http://www.ufcw175.com/loblaws/

Quote:
Loblaw Company Negotiations 2010

Media Release - Aug 13, 2010

UFCW Canada and Loblaw to continue Ontario grocery store contract talks; no strike date set

TORONTO, Aug. 13 /CNW/ - The latest session of contract talks between Loblaw and the union that represents 30,000 of the grocery giant's workers in several Ontario banners wound up yesterday in Niagara Falls with the two sides agreeing to resume negotiations later this month.

UFCW Canada local unions 1977, 1000A and 175 & 633 say that none of the major issues on the table have yet been settled but that, "as long as there is forward momentum towards a settlement, we will continue to negotiate."

Although the union was given a 97 per cent strike mandate by its membership in early July, no strike date has yet been set.

Talks are scheduled to reconvene on August 24, 2010.

The store banners affected by these negotiations include Loblaws, Zehrs, Real Canadian Superstores, Great Food and Fortinos, all subsidiaries of Weston-controlled Loblaw Companies Limited, Canada's largest retailer.


Back to top profile :: pm
John Briley
Post Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 3:00 pm

Joined: 21 Nov 2007
Posts: 616
Quote:
Loblaw contract talks nearing critical phase

August 28, 2010

Contract talks were held from Tuesday to Friday this past week in Niagara Falls. While there have been no breakthroughs, there has been enough movement by the company on the union's key issues to warrant additional talks.

Further talks are scheduled from September 8-11, with the goal of reaching a settlement that the union's negotiating committee can recommend to the members. If no settlement is reached at that time, a strike deadline will be finalized.

A media statement to this effect has been jointly released by the presidents of all locals that signed the 2005 Solidarity Pact: Scott Penner (1977), Kevin Corporon (1000A) and Shawn Haggerty (175 & 633).

"It is not unusual for bargaining to take this long but it cannot go on forever," the presidents said.

"We're going into the next round with the firm intention of reaching a settlement we can recommend to the members. If that doesn't happen, we have to move this process to the next level.

"It will be good for both parties to have a fair and amicable settlement and the union has been working in that spirit."

30,000 UFCW Canada members are represented at the bargaining table. Loblaw is Ontario's - and Canada's ¬- largest retailer.

UFCW Canada and its predecessor unions began representing workers at Loblaws in Ontario in 1944. The union also represents Loblaw Companies workers throughout Canada.


UFCW Local 1000A website:
http://www.ufcw1000a.ca/index.asp?pid=359

Quote:
UFCW Canada says it hopes that talks scheduled from September 8-11 can produce a settlement that it can recommend to its members.



http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/capress/100828/business/loblaw_talks_1

To be continued......
Back to top profile :: pm
SharynS
Post Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 10:27 pm

Joined: 28 Jan 2006
Posts: 2883
Location: the 'puter
Quote:
...If that doesn't happen, we have to move this process to the next level.
I think that's code for handing it off to arbitration or mediation or some such binding device often used to avoid a disruption in the labour peace keeper's cash flow.

_________________
Free speech is the whole thing, the whole ball game. Free speech is life itself. - Salman Rushdie
Back to top profile :: pm :: e-mail :: www
John Briley
Post Posted: Fri Sep 17, 2010 3:30 am

Joined: 21 Nov 2007
Posts: 616
Quote:
October 8 strike deadline at Loblaw Companies if no settlement reached

September 11, 2010

Four days of talks between UFCW Canada and Loblaw Companies Ltd. wound up today with some progress on key issues but no settlement in the prolonged negotiations that have been underway since April.

UFCW local unions 1977, 1000A and 175 & 633 say there are major issues that need to be resolved if a strike is to be avoided. The union's bargaining committee set a strike deadline of 12:01 a.m., Friday, October 8, if no agreement is reached and ratified by the membership at Loblaws, Zehrs, Real Canadian Superstores and Great Food stores, all subsidiaries of Weston-controlled Loblaw Companies Limited, Canada’s largest retailer.

Further meetings between the union and the company have been scheduled for the week beginning Monday, September 27 through to Saturday, October 2nd.

The Provincial Mediator assisting in the negotiations has asked that the company and the union not communicate any further with the media beyond releases today while negotiations continue. The union will honour this request.

Listen to Kevin Corporon's September 11 message to members.


Back to top profile :: pm
Home arrow Forums arrow Your Union arrow Ontario Loblaw workers vote 97% for strike mandate
Page 3 of 8
page: prev  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  next
Display posts from previous:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group