uncharted.ca :: View topic - Out Loud / An Inside Job?

Home

Out Loud / An Inside Job?

page: prev 1, 2	Display posts from previous:

Author	Message

mescallito	Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 11:32 am
Joined: 18 Apr 2006 Posts: 34 Location: a shade tree	Quote: Too bad you never spent any time any the military. Seen it happen. Jets screaming in at treetop height. Yes it is possible and is done everyday. But by highly trained personnel, not video rental clerks who have trained on Microsoft Simulator software! Quote: The film does exist, I saw it and it was pulled from the media after a few days. Interesting! I don't remember any video showing a commercial plane and I have searched in vain to find any mention of such a video. Now that's a very good coverup!! There are a number of very good videos hosted by google. _________________ Dreaming is the door to the unimaginable!
Back to top	profile :: pm







unionnow	Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 2:30 pm
Joined: 05 Feb 2006 Posts: 695 Location: Gettin the Hell out of retail	Quote: Interesting! I don't remember any video showing a commercial plane and I have searched in vain to find any mention of such a video. Now that's a very good coverup!! I know. It was on CNN a couple of times. It was Pentagon video and they owned it and probably took it back in all forms. Its not out there any more but I am not lying, I saw it. Quote: Interesting comment UN, what would be the difference between a government which manipulates or secrets evidence to it's own end and one which masterminds evidence to it's own end? I am one to believe in government conspiracies and I know that they have massive control over the media. Hell, two guys holding up a gas station is a conspiracy. My question is, where did flight 77 go and where are the people that were on it? That’s one hell of a trick making a whole plane disappear with passengers and crew Do me a favor, check this site out. It has pictures of aircraft parts in and around the Pentagon. Review it and then post. http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/911_pentagon_757_plane_evidence.html _________________ “The burden against Damascus. ‘Behold, Damascus will cease from being a city, and it will be a ruinous heap. (Isaiah 17:1-2)
Back to top	profile :: pm :: e-mail



SharynS	Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 11:53 pm
Joined: 28 Jan 2006 Posts: 2939 Location: the 'puter	I'm not at all familiar with the pentagon but I couldn't help notice that the pentagon's exterior siding which appears in the picture of "APU" is not the same as the exterior siding which appears in the picture of the near perfectly circular hole. There are mulitple windows in one picture, yet none in the other. What is the relationship of those exteriors to each other? And what is the relationship of the jet's impact to those two exteriors? I also think the transposed image of the jet into the skyline photo is a huge stretch. I don't see a jet plane outline or anything even closely resembling one. Rather it looks like the outline of far off buildings through a smoky blurry badly done blow-up. It is very difficult to discern what it is with an out-of-line jet's image flashing on and off. I would ask to see that photo without the storyteller's visual aid before I could even consider it as possibly legitimate. _________________ Free speech is the whole thing, the whole ball game. Free speech is life itself. - Salman Rushdie
Back to top	profile :: pm :: e-mail :: www



timidsumo	Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 5:06 am
Joined: 09 Feb 2006 Posts: 35	siggy wrote: I'm not at all familiar with the pentagon but I couldn't help notice that the pentagon's exterior siding which appears in the picture of "APU" is not the same as the exterior siding which appears in the picture of the near perfectly circular hole. There are mulitple windows in one picture, yet none in the other. The pentagon has five rings, named ABCDE. There is an access road at ground level between rings B and C. Whatever hit the building penetrated under rings E,D and C, leaving a hole in the wall of ring C at the level of the access road. It did not affect rings A or B.
Back to top	profile :: pm



unionnow	Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 5:52 pm
Joined: 05 Feb 2006 Posts: 695 Location: Gettin the Hell out of retail	Quote: I'm not at all familiar with the pentagon but I couldn't help notice that the pentagon's exterior siding which appears in the picture of "APU" is not the same as the exterior siding which appears in the picture of the near perfectly circular hole. There are mulitple windows in one picture, yet none in the other. The pentagon was hastily and shoddily build in WWII. Its going thru a remodel that adds blast proof windows and Kevlar coatings in the walls. The section hit by the jet? was the first part of the building done and almost completed, that might account for the difference. Quote: I also think the transposed image of the jet into the skyline photo is a huge stretch. The author follow that with this quote, "However, once again - this is entirely subjective and the image quality from the released surveillance camera is not good enough to form a factual opinion." I think the real conspiracy is in that the government is conspiring to make the conspiracy people look like fools. The only pictures in the public domain were taken by citizens. I know the government has thousands of stills yet they have not been released. They had to be sued to release one video which was of poor quality. Any investigation would have produced vast amounts of film and stills. They are sitting on them. Why? Because thru agent provocateurs they have been able to turn the real conspiracy, which was a conspiracy of ignoring what they knew was going to happen to a conspiracy of the foolish notions that WTC was mined, and the jet did not hit the Pentagon. More photos... http://anderson.ath.cx:8000/911/pen06.html More accounts... http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/evidence/witnesses/bart.html _________________ “The burden against Damascus. ‘Behold, Damascus will cease from being a city, and it will be a ruinous heap. (Isaiah 17:1-2)
Back to top	profile :: pm :: e-mail



unionnow	Posted: Sat Jun 24, 2006 4:34 am
Joined: 05 Feb 2006 Posts: 695 Location: Gettin the Hell out of retail	I thought I would post this link from the family steering committe of the 911 commission. They dragged the G kicking and screaming, by force, to hold the 911 inquiry. Most of their questions were never answered. http://www.911independentcommission.org/questions.html _________________ “The burden against Damascus. ‘Behold, Damascus will cease from being a city, and it will be a ruinous heap. (Isaiah 17:1-2)
Back to top	profile :: pm :: e-mail



timidsumo	Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 7:19 am
Joined: 09 Feb 2006 Posts: 35	unionnow wrote: Most of their questions were never answered. Here's a paper by a tort outfit on how the families were muzzled:- http://www.speiserkrause.com/publications/compensation_fund.pdf And this is piece on the conspiracy industry:- http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/CDCC04E2-8DE8-4625-B380-DD74EC0F3AC9.htm
Back to top	profile :: pm

Home

Forums

The Soap Box

Out Loud / An Inside Job?


Page 2 of 2 page: prev 1, 2	Display posts from previous:
	Jump to: