Home arrow Forums arrow Your Union arrow SF Hearing For Grocery Workers Retention Ordinance.

SF Hearing For Grocery Workers Retention Ordinance.

Display posts from previous:
Author Message
Jeff-Hulk-Hemp
Post Posted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 9:51 pm

Joined: 10 Feb 2006
Posts: 448
http://www.indybay.org/news/2006/04/1816640.php

Monday, 17 April: Dozens of San Francisco grocery store workers and union leaders testified before the Board of Supervisors Committee on City Operations in support of the proposed Grocery Workers Retention Ordinance.

Confronted by the sale and closures of Cala Foods and Bell Markets in San Francisco and the sale of Albertson's stores to a New York investment company, SF grocery store workers took another step forward in the struggle to preserve their jobs and livliehoods. On Monday, 17 April, the Committee on City Operations and Neighborhood Services held hearings on a proposed Grocery Workers Retention Ordinance introduced by Supervisor Fiona Ma and co-sponsored by a majority of the Board of Supervisors.

Dozens of grocery workers attended the hearing, chaired by Supervisor Bevan Dufty, and offered testimony in support of the legislation. Union leaders, including Tim Paulson of the SF Labor Council, and representatives from the Teamsters and the United Farm Workers, publically shared their support. President of UFCW Local 648/SF, Mike Sharpe spoke of the anxieties caused among store workers by the prospect of losing their jobs and saluted the Supervisors for providing hope for the employees. A Safeway employee, William Sable, vigorously defended the proposed Ordinance, stating that there is no substitute for experienced professionals in providing the food that San Franciscans put on their tables; he cited Sir Walter Scott's observation that
" it's not fish ye're buying - it's men's lives".
Back to top profile :: pm :: www :: aim
SharynS
Post Posted: Sat Apr 22, 2006 4:14 am

Joined: 28 Jan 2006
Posts: 2939
Location: the 'puter
Quote:
To put an end to such practices, working people's allies to the Los Angeles City Council have passed a worker retention ordinance. Through the proposed Grocery Worker Retention Ordinance (GWRO), the City seeks to sustain the stability of a workforce that forms the cornerstones of communities in Los Angeles. GWRO request to the "incumbent grocery employer" to provide the the "successor grocery employer" (the entity operating the establishment occupation classification of all employees employed by the incumbent grocery employer at the time transfer. This list is used to effect the following retention requirements of the Ordinance:

* Retention, for a transition period of ninety days, by the successor employer of those grocery employees who have been employed by the incumbent grocery employer for at least six months.
* Upon a determination by the successor employer that fewer grocery employees are required, employer's grocery employees based on their respective seniority within job classifications.
* Employees from the incumbent grocery employer may only be terminated for cause; and
* Following the transition period, the successor employer must perform written performance evaluation for each retained grocery employee and consider offering each retained grocery employee continued employment if the employee's performance was satisfactory.
"..."sustain the stability of the workforce..." hmmm....

IMO it's not good enough! The ordinances gives greater consideration to the corporate interest than it does to workers - we don't need any more of those typed up into law. Thanks but no thanks? Bring us something we can live with and grow on - we'll talk. Rolling Eyes

_________________
Free speech is the whole thing, the whole ball game. Free speech is life itself. - Salman Rushdie
Back to top profile :: pm :: e-mail :: www
SharynS
Post Posted: Sat Apr 22, 2006 4:15 am

Joined: 28 Jan 2006
Posts: 2939
Location: the 'puter
Quote:
To put an end to such practices, working people's allies to the Los Angeles City Council have passed a worker retention ordinance. Through the proposed Grocery Worker Retention Ordinance (GWRO), the City seeks to sustain the stability of a workforce that forms the cornerstones of communities in Los Angeles. GWRO request to the "incumbent grocery employer" to provide the the "successor grocery employer" (the entity operating the establishment occupation classification of all employees employed by the incumbent grocery employer at the time transfer. This list is used to effect the following retention requirements of the Ordinance:

* Retention, for a transition period of ninety days, by the successor employer of those grocery employees who have been employed by the incumbent grocery employer for at least six months.
* Upon a determination by the successor employer that fewer grocery employees are required, employer's grocery employees based on their respective seniority within job classifications.
* Employees from the incumbent grocery employer may only be terminated for cause; and
* Following the transition period, the successor employer must perform written performance evaluation for each retained grocery employee and consider offering each retained grocery employee continued employment if the employee's performance was satisfactory.
"..."sustain the stability of the workforce..." hmmm....

It's not good enough IMO, not even close! The proposed ordinance gives greater consideration to the corporate interest than it does to workers - we don't need any more of those typed up into law. Thanks but no thanks? Bring people something we can live with and grow on - we'll talk. Rolling Eyes

_________________
Free speech is the whole thing, the whole ball game. Free speech is life itself. - Salman Rushdie
Back to top profile :: pm :: e-mail :: www
mescallito
Post Posted: Sun Jun 11, 2006 12:27 pm

Joined: 18 Apr 2006
Posts: 34
Location: a shade tree
Quote:
Worker retention is heavily supported by local unions, and grocery workers who have been affected by a transfer in ownership have testified before the council at least twice, offering horror stories of poverty and despair following a sale. Those workers said the parent company of Albertsons is planning to close several of its unionized stores and replace them with non-union Whole Foods markets.


_________________
Dreaming is the door to the unimaginable!
Back to top profile :: pm
SFway
Post Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2006 12:51 am

Joined: 26 May 2006
Posts: 573
The Grocery Workers Retention Ordinance(s) passed in the LA and SF areas are, in fact, not a "silver bullet" solution to the problems supermarket workers are confronting. In essence, they are WARN act stipulations, mandated and applied locally.
Having said that, if properly utilized from locality to locality, they can be a useful organizing tool, to get union and non-union grocery workers together on the same issue, to get them in front of their elected officials and before the public.
The GWRO is not an end in itself, but a means to an end, which is the information, education and mobilization of the grocery workforce.
Back to top profile :: pm :: e-mail
SharynS
Post Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2006 1:43 am

Joined: 28 Jan 2006
Posts: 2939
Location: the 'puter
Quote:
“I think it sends a message to the broader business community, let along food retailers, that politicians are hostile to our interests,” Larkin added.
In the face of an awakening and ever expanding community, environmental and social justice global conscience, does the man know how stupid the statement is?

Larkin is obviously missing the point. Hostility toward corporate interest is on the upswing. Get used to it because it's only the beginning. Really these people become less and less relevant as each day passes and each and everytime they try to make a lame corporate claim.
Quote:
Few contemporary nations seem more divided politically than the United States. Beyond the partisan rancor, however, polling data point to a broad consensus on core values and suggest that if the institutions of governmental and corporate power were accountable to the public will, the United States would be persuing very different policies both domestically and internationally. These institutions have been at odds for so long with core values and interests of the nation that most people have given up hope of any change. The residual frustration, however, runs high and represents a powerful latent political force. - David Korten
So go ahead Larkin - push us again! Rolling Eyes

_________________
Free speech is the whole thing, the whole ball game. Free speech is life itself. - Salman Rushdie
Back to top profile :: pm :: e-mail :: www
Home arrow Forums arrow Your Union arrow SF Hearing For Grocery Workers Retention Ordinance.
Page 1 of 1
Display posts from previous:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group