Home arrow Forums arrow Your Union arrow Ontario Loblaw workers vote 97% for strike mandate

Ontario Loblaw workers vote 97% for strike mandate

page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  next
Display posts from previous:
Author Message
silverboy
Post Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 9:10 pm

Joined: 13 Feb 2006
Posts: 50
Location: North America
Ontario Loblaw workers vote 97% for strike mandate

Quote:
Loblaw Co. workers in Ontario have overwhelmingly voted in favour of giving their union authority to call a strike against Canada's largest grocery chain if negotiations don't improve after months of stalled talks.

Over 97 per cent of members of the United Food and Commercial Workers union, which represents nearly 30,000 employees at stores under names such as Loblaws, Zehrs, Real Canadian Superstores and Fortinos, have voted in favour of a strike.

The labour dispute at Loblaw (TSX:L) could potentially send those 30,000 Ontario workers to the picket lines if talks fail, said Scott Penner, president of UFCW Local 1977, headquartered in Cambridge, Ont..

The strike vote came after talks between the union and Loblaw that were overseen by the Ontario Ministry of Labour broke off.

“We haven't been able to make any headway,” Penner said, adding that a strike could close all of the chain's stores in Ontario.


ed=linkfix
Back to top profile :: pm
SharynS
Post Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 10:21 pm

Joined: 28 Jan 2006
Posts: 2883
Location: the 'puter
Now where have we heard that before.

"...The labour dispute... ... could potentially send those 30,000 Ontario workers to the picket lines" - and/or the cleaners. I'm sure loblaw's head honchos are shaking in their guccis.

Thanks for the smile silverboy and good luck.

_________________
Free speech is the whole thing, the whole ball game. Free speech is life itself. - Salman Rushdie
Back to top profile :: pm :: e-mail :: www
John Briley
Post Posted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 5:47 pm

Joined: 21 Nov 2007
Posts: 616
Loblaw Companies Limited Announces Second Quarter 2010 Earnings Release.

http://micro.newswire.ca/release.cgi?rkey=1806226879&view=62151-0&Start=0&htm=0

With Loblaws "pending" announcement for their second quarter earnings slated for July 22, 2010, it will be interesting to see just how profitable this Company was during the second quarter for 2010?
Back to top profile :: pm
SharynS
Post Posted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 7:10 pm

Joined: 28 Jan 2006
Posts: 2883
Location: the 'puter
Loblaw profit rises
Quote:
Loblaw Companies, Canada’s biggest supermarket chain, said first-quarter profit rose almost 26%, though the food market remains “wobbly” with unemployment and high household debt weighing on consumer spending habits.

The company had net earnings of $137 million, compared with $109 million in the year-ago period. Sales rose 3.1% to $6.9 billion, it said. The acquisition of ethnic food chain T&T Supermarket, which was completed in the third quarter of last year, added 2% to sales, it said.
Take your pick. One set of books for it's investors and another for negotiating with it's employees. The sick part is that ufcw doesn't seem all that motivated to shine lights on it's retail partner's book cooking capacity.

_________________
Free speech is the whole thing, the whole ball game. Free speech is life itself. - Salman Rushdie
Back to top profile :: pm :: e-mail :: www
John Briley
Post Posted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 7:38 pm

Joined: 21 Nov 2007
Posts: 616
Quote:
“That’s completely unacceptable,” said Kevin Corporon, president of Local 1000A of the UFCW, one of three locals bargaining together. They represent 30,000 workers at Loblaws, Zehrs, Fortinos, Great Food and Real Canadian SuperStores across the province.

More than 97 per cent voted over the weekend in favour of a strike as the two sides head into another round of talks on Monday, July 19, this time with the help of a provincially appointed mediator".



So here is a question that someone can help me out with.

With three (3) UFCW Local Unions bargaining together and representing 30,000 UFCW Members collectively, how does the 97% Strike Vote really "break down"?

How Many Members Voted Yes To Strike ________ Total
How Many Members Voted No To Strike ________ Total
Back to top profile :: pm
SharynS
Post Posted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 10:35 pm

Joined: 28 Jan 2006
Posts: 2883
Location: the 'puter
To answer your question JB.
Quote:
UFCW Local 832 Manitoba - NEGOTIATIONS AND RATIFICATIONS
UFCW Local 832 endorses Greg Selinger as leader of Manitoba NDP. ... February 22, 2009. Safeway members vote 97% in favour of strike action. ...
Quote:
UFCW Local 152: Organizing 101 - Employer Tactics
The union cannot force you to strike. A strike is a decision voted on by ... Ninety-Seven percent (97%) of all UFCW contracts are settled without strikes. ...
www.ufcwlocal152.org/employertactics.html - Cached
Quote:
L.A. Supermarket Strike
In October of last year, 97% of members of the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW) in southern and central California voted to strike Von's, ...
home.earthlink.net/~lrgoldner/supermarket.html
Quote:
Berkeley Bowl workers vote against union - SFGate
31 Oct 2003 ... In its flyer, the union notes that 97% percent of members of UFCW Local 770, ... California grocery workers, voted to authorize a strike. ...
articles.sfgate.com/.../17515114_1_union-representation-grocery-store-berkeley-bowl-marketplace
Quote:
UFCW Represented Kroger Workers in Houston Show Strength and ...
In Houston, where 12700 workers are involved in negotiations with Kroger, UFCW members turned out in droves to vote by over 97% to authorize a strike ...
findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_pwwi/is_200705/ai_n19178346/
Quote:
Safeway members vote 97% in favour of strike action. | Facebook
1 post - Last post: 22 Feb 2009
... vote 97% in favour of strike action. Back to UFCW Local 832 ... down the offer and handed the negotiating committee a 97% strike mandate ...(emphasis mine)
Quote:
97%....
^^^a mere sampling^^^ from the hundreds of search results to choose from.

_________________
Free speech is the whole thing, the whole ball game. Free speech is life itself. - Salman Rushdie
Back to top profile :: pm :: e-mail :: www
Rose Knows
Post Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2010 4:39 am

Joined: 16 Nov 2009
Posts: 240
The current UFCW leadership will undermine the existing membership during a strike because in there opinion the union would be better off if long term employees lost there job because Loblaws could hire 3 new employees for the cost of 1 senior employee and get 3 sets of union dues.I HAVE HERD LOCAL 1000a EXECUTIVE VOICE THIS OPINION. EXECUTIVE PAY IS BASED ON MEMBERSHIP NUMBERS NOT QUALITY OF MEMBERSHIP PAY SCALE. Also as an added bonus Loblaws would get away with paying little to no benefits. The union office is totally secure in there position as any No Frills employee can tell you that the union has succession rights to an existing location but the Loblaws employee does not.
The union executive is gauranteed there cushy job with mutipal pensions lavish cars and other perks no matter wich way the strike turns out.
If the membership wants effective bargaining than they must hold the executives feet to the fire over the issue of succession rights.

Rose Knows
UFCW Local 175/633
Back to top profile :: pm :: e-mail
John Briley
Post Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 12:57 am

Joined: 21 Nov 2007
Posts: 616
SharynS wrote:
Quote:
^^^a mere sampling^^^ from the hundreds of search results to choose from.


So Sharyn ..... is just me or does it appear to be a long standing pattern within the UFCW and their infamous 97% Strike Authorization Votes??

I wanted to once again re-visit my question raised regarding the recent vote taken by the Loblaw members.

Let's examine the UFCW Canada Home Page:
http://www.ufcw.ca/

Specifically, this release found on their website:

Near Unananimous Strike Vote Steps Up Pressure in Ontario Loblaw / UFCW Canada Retail Negotiations:
http://www.ufcw.ca/Default.aspx?SectionId=af80f8cf-ddd2-4b12-9f41-641ea94d4fa4&LanguageId=1&ItemId=a21cea07-332c-4072-8cff-542944bc90b4

I wanted to focus on the following excerpt taken from the above release:

Quote:
UFCW Canada Local Unions 1977, 1000A, 175 and 633 conducted the secret ballot strike votes at over 50 locations around the province over the past two weeks, from Windsor to Ottawa and dozens of cities in between. Voting finished on July 11.

The locals collectively represent nearly 30,000 store-level workers at Loblaws, Zehrs, Real Canadian Superstores, Great Food and Fortinos — all subsidiaries of Weston-controlled Loblaw Companies Limited, Canada's largest retailer.


I still would like to know, if at all possible, how many Members out of the 30,000 Members from UFCW Locals #1977,#1000A,#175 & #633 actually attended their Strike Vote Meetings at over 50 locations to cast their Vote.

How Many Members Voted Yes To Strike ________ Total
How Many Members Voted No To Strike ________ Total

Once we get those numbers, then we can get a better understanding as to the significance of the infamous 97% Strike Vote!
Back to top profile :: pm
SharynS
Post Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 2:22 am

Joined: 28 Jan 2006
Posts: 2883
Location: the 'puter
97% is a nice number, not too small, not too round, looks great in print and has the potential to scare the benefits out of any employer (eventually?).

Perhaps we can close in on the results if we crunch the numbers ourselves.

1. 97% x30,000 would be 29,100 in favour 900 nays.

(A ufcw's recurring nightmare no doubt but, one it would be shouting from the expensive resort rooftops if it happened. I would think a photo op if ever there was one. labour climate vbeing what it is (read: union sucking ass) it would most certainly not fall into the "sensitive" info category IMO. Safe to cross it off)

2. 97% x 15,000 = 14,550 in favour, 450 nays.

(Again bordering on bizU nightmare material but surely still worthy of UFCW's PR machine. Haven't heard anything, cross it off)

3. 97% x 7500 = 7275 in favour, 225 opposed. (totally something to write home about, no-one has, cross it off)

4. 97% x 3750 = 3637,5 in favour, just under 115 opposed.

(this would perhaps fall somewhere into the "sensitive information" category I would think. Any employer c/would eat it up. Mark this one)

5. 97% x 1875 = approx 1819 in favour, balance opposed.

(still a marvelous trick for ufcw but unfortunately one of those you can dress it up but can't take it no place sort of things. Mark this one)

6. 97% x 10 = 9.7 in favour, .3 opposed. (This definitely qualifies as "sensitive information" eh. Mark it)

Rose anything you could tell us. Has any info been released about actual membership turnout? How about the vote itself, how did the local(s) organize it as far as access and notification etc.? Inquiring minds want to know.

_________________
Free speech is the whole thing, the whole ball game. Free speech is life itself. - Salman Rushdie
Back to top profile :: pm :: e-mail :: www
John Briley
Post Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 3:41 am

Joined: 21 Nov 2007
Posts: 616
SharynS wrote:
Quote:
Rose anything you could tell us. Has any info been released about actual membership turnout? How about the vote itself, how did the local(s) organize it as far as access and notification etc.? Inquiring minds want to know.


Sharyn.... I tried to get a "peak under the covers" as to membership numbers from the following UFCW Local Union websites:

Quote:
Negotiations are scheduled to resume on July 19 with the assistance of a provincial mediator from the Ministry of Labour.

For further information:
UFCW Canada Local 1977, Scott Penner, President, 519.658.0252, www.ufcw1977.ca
UFCW Canada Local 1000A, Kevin Corporon, President, 905-850-0096, www.ufcw1000a.ca
UFCW Local 175 and 633, Shawn Haggerty, President,905-821-8329, www.ufcw175.com


UFCW Local 1977 stated;

Quote:
Local 1977 President, Scott Penner, would like to thank our Membership for their strong resolve and for the tremendous support they have shown their Bargaining Committee. Voting was held at 26 locations across the province over the past two weeks and more than 3300 members sent an overwhelmingly clear message that the Bargaining Table Committee has a strong mandate to negotiate the best Collective Agreement possible.



Interestingly enough, UFCW Local 1000A states:

Quote:
98 % - Strong Strike Mandate Shows Solidarity

July 9, 2010


In a show of solidarity, over the course of 3 days and 22 meetings across Ontario, thousands of Loblaws / RCSS and Loblaw Great Food store workers who are members of UFCW Canada Local 1000A came out and voted and sent an overwhelmingly clear message that their bargaining committee has a strong mandate to strike.

Local 1000A President, Kevin Corporon, would like to thank the membership for the tremendous turnout and their continued support of their bargaining committee.

Locals, 1000A, 1977, 175 and 633 continue negotiations with the assistance of a Provincial Mediator from July 19 to 23 and again from August 9 to 12.

Please watch for future updates to be posted on www.ufcw1000a.ca and on the Union Information Board in your store.



We now have a 98% Strike Vote from UFCW Local 1000A???? Why not just round it off to 100% and call it a day!!!
Back to top profile :: pm
SharynS
Post Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 1:12 pm

Joined: 28 Jan 2006
Posts: 2883
Location: the 'puter
Quote:
I tried to get a "peak under the covers"
Did you try the employer's hotel suite?

_________________
Free speech is the whole thing, the whole ball game. Free speech is life itself. - Salman Rushdie
Back to top profile :: pm :: e-mail :: www
unionnow
Post Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 7:38 pm

Joined: 05 Feb 2006
Posts: 658
Location: Gettin the Hell out of retail
Quote:
Workers are frustrated over company proposals that would cut wages by up to 25 per cent, increase waiting times for benefits eligibility and reduce full-time jobs [along with massive pension reductions]. Workers at those stores make between the minimum wage of $10.25 and $25 an hour, plus benefits.


These are the numbers that count and the numbers we will see in the upcoming Nor Cal negotiations. The UFCW will run delay but the outcome is inevitable.

Massive raises for the union staff along with massive pay cuts for the members. Staff bennies remain the same or get better and the members bennies are going to be gutted.

They cannot unionized the non union retail employers so they will take us down to their level economically and keep us paying dues.

Get out of the union retail business, its over. Find a job in another industry that has some opportunities, there are none in retail.

_________________
“The burden against Damascus. ‘Behold, Damascus will cease from being a city, and it will be a ruinous heap. (Isaiah 17:1-2)
Back to top profile :: pm :: e-mail
TNT
Post Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 9:52 pm

Joined: 18 Feb 2006
Posts: 27
Location: Somewhere in Hell
Real Canadian Superstore grocery and retail store workers in Thunder Bay may have avoided a strike after the union that represents them reached a tentative deal with their employer Wednesday.

we’ve gotten the best we can get for the membership," said Paul Docherty

Couldn't figure out how to use the quote thingy but I'll bet it's not the last time we hear the one above.
I know it's not the first time. Sad

http://www.tbnewswatch.com/news/101255/Superstore-reaches-tentative-deal-with-UFCW-
Back to top profile :: pm
the doc
Post Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 2:29 pm

Joined: 27 Sep 2006
Posts: 121
The UFCW does not usually release total # of votes cast, just the % of those cast. You could have say 10 people at the meeting and 9 vote to strike and all of a sudden you have a 90% vote to strike. I would likely guess that out of 30,000 people, 2/3 thousand turned out to vote and only 97% of those chose the strike route. The UFCW meetings usually draw about 10 people and that is for 3 maybe 4 chains in the same room. So what is read are the minutes and business and then votes. For Strikes etc. that could come at a regular meeting or at a separate meeting, but they are usually very low turnout also. Wink
Back to top profile :: pm
Laboryes
Post Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 2:58 pm

Joined: 29 Jan 2006
Posts: 1959
Rose Knows wrote:

The union executive is gauranteed there cushy job with mutipal pensions lavish cars and other perks no matter wich way the strike turns out.
If the membership wants effective bargaining than they must hold the executives feet to the fire over the issue of succession rights.


Don't hold your breath Rose if Canadian UFCW members are anything like the members in California this will never happen.

You've got better odds seeing a "clean" Gulf Coast then you do seeing UFCW members rise up and hold their union officals accountable.

Sorry for the negativity, but I’ve beat that dead horse over and over and “always” the same result... passivity, apathy, and complacency from the members. I believe the UFCW members will have to hit rock bottom before you see any action from them! This next round of California negotiations should just about put them there.

_________________
"When people refuse to obey, then democracy comes alive."
Howard Zinn
Back to top profile :: pm
Home arrow Forums arrow Your Union arrow Ontario Loblaw workers vote 97% for strike mandate
Page 1 of 8
page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  next
Display posts from previous:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group