Home arrow Forums arrow Your Union arrow UFCW & Employers Trust Fund Participant Blow Off?

UFCW & Employers Trust Fund Participant Blow Off?

page: prev  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Display posts from previous:
Author Message
SFway
Post Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 7:32 pm

Joined: 26 May 2006
Posts: 573
Meanwhile, to return to Mr. Silveira's corporate fascination with Thomas Merton...let us pursue his thought for another step or two.

"The life of a pure soul becomes exceedingly simple. But the impure soul is, and must be, most complicated. There are so many things to be done! One must assert himself, and exalt himself, and at the same time think himself self-sacrificing and humble...One must make sure that no desire goes unfulfilled. In a word, one's own will must be done on earth as God's will is done in heaven.

....such a soul is inevitably subject to insecurity and fear. And fear is the "color" which darkens the soul...Fear is the "impurity" of the soul that aspires to be omnipotent."


Thomas Merton The Silent Life pp. 17-18
Back to top profile :: pm :: e-mail
SFway
Post Posted: Thu Apr 08, 2010 7:29 pm

Joined: 26 May 2006
Posts: 573
And for today's exploration of the thoughts of Thomas Merton [especially for the reading pleasure of Mike Silveira of SAVE-MART/LUCKY/ETC] we offer the following:

describing our world as "...a world of servile and mercenary conformities."

"To justify our own condition of servility and spiritual prostitution we think it sufficient to admire another man's integrity."


"Communism [b][editor's note: and one might argue the corporate structure is of an equal nature] has proposed to control life with a rigid system and with the tyrrany of artificial forms. Those who have believed in this delusion and yielded themselves up to it as a 'superior force' have paid the penalty by ceasing top be complete human beings, by ceasing to live in the full sense of the word, by ceasing to be men."[/b]

[editor's note: this observation, for example, could certainly be applied to that scion of corporate leadership, the CEO/etc. of Massey Energy who is directly responsible for the deaths of 25 miners in West Virginia and the multiple safety violations which produced those deaths while (a) making obscene profits personally and for his corporation, qand (b) blaming the miners for their own deaths.

I wonder if Mr. Silveira - or any corporate or union leader - sees themselves reflected in the actions, inactions and words of this individual?]


Thomas Merton "The Pasternak Affair" Disputed Questions Farrar, Straus and Giroux 1953, 1960
Back to top profile :: pm :: e-mail
SFway
Post Posted: Thu Apr 08, 2010 7:36 pm

Joined: 26 May 2006
Posts: 573
So, let this constitute an honest and open invitation for Mr. Mike Silveira of SAVE-MART/LUCKY/ETC-MART to come on out and slap down another Thomas Merton card.

Come on, Mike...it might be fun and we might boith learn something.

Seriously.

Neutral
Back to top profile :: pm :: e-mail
John Briley
Post Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2010 2:17 am

Joined: 21 Nov 2007
Posts: 616
SFway.... Thank You for the Thomas Merton update.

BTW.... For anyone who might be interested, here is some additional information re: Michael Silveira, SaveMart Supermarkets and Bob Piccinini, UFCW 's 2009 Person of the Year.

1. http://www.linkedin.com/pub/michael-silveira/12/351/b4

2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Save_Mart_Supermarkets

3. http://forums.uncharted.ca/viewtopic.php?p=17596&highlight=#17596
Back to top profile :: pm
Inside Lurker
Post Posted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 3:28 am

Joined: 01 Nov 2009
Posts: 99
Go ahead Briley, tell them how you really feel Mr. Green

Quote:
Hello Ron ---- I can not thank you and Mr. Silveira enough for providing me with such great material in your e-mail response(s) to me dated Friday, April 2, 2010. Your "duelling e-mails" reminded me of a "comic strip" featuring Lind & Silveira as "Pete" & "Repeat" .

Ron seriously, I would have been quite embarrassed if an Employer Representative ever came to my defense during my 17+ years as President @ former UFCW Local 839. Having said that, when I saw both of your e-mail response(s) the first thing that came to my mind was how quickly you & Mr. Silveira responded to my e-mail dated Friday, April 2, 2010 @ 9:29 am. Even though both of your e-mails didn't provide me with any viable information, I couldn't help to think that after 2+ years neither one of you could provide me with any answers to the main question. Where is the finalized version of the Retiree & Pension SPD's?

The second thing that came to my mind was WHY did Silveira respond. Was his immediate response due to the "business relationship / partnership" that you and the other UFCW Local Unions, including the I.U., currently enjoy with Mr. Silveira and SaveMart Supermarkets here in Northern California. Or, was Silveira just "watching your back"?

To illustrate my point, I have provided you with my e-mail that I sent to you back on Friday, November 9, 2007 along with various attachments. Specifically, we can't forget about the infamous Local 5 seven (7) page color coded document, outlining the numerous takeaways negotiated by UFCW Locals #5,#8,#101 & #648 and SaveMart Supermarkets.

In my opinion, based on that document, it is no wonder why the Chief Administrative Officer @ SaveMart Supermarkets Michael Silveira, wants to keep you as his "buddy" and came to your defense so quickly.

By way of another example, how about this cozy relationship the UFCW recently orchestrated with Mr. Piccinini Chairman and CEO, of SaveMart Supermarkets.

http://forums.uncharted.ca/viewtopic.php?p=17596&highlight=#17596

Ron, as we both know this was the UFCW's way of saying Thank You to Mr. Piccinini for delivering / converting all of those non-union SaveMart Supermarket employees / stores into UFCW dues paying members. The $64,000.00 dollar question still remains unanswered. What did the UFCW have to give up to get those non-union stores? I guess my immediate answer would be, how about taking a look at the seven (7) page color coded document of takeaways for starters?

I will now attempt to respond to both of your (Lind & Silveira) e-mails that were sent to me on Friday, April 2, 2010.

****************************************************
Below is the complete text of Ron Lind's e-mail response to John Briley dated Friday, April 2, 2010 @ 9:54 am:

John

I had hoped that our relationship had developed to the point where you would pick up the phone and call me if you had questions or concerns rather than attacking me via email and copying the universe. I will ask for an update on the SPD and get back to you. As for the retiree health care piece I promised to let you know if anything new was happening. There is nothing to report.

Ron

Ron, where do I begin? I guess we should first start with, Ron....., take a deep breath, now exhale.... Once again, you have lost your focus! This isn't about you or me? So quit trying to make this into a "pity party for yourself". What is interesting and quite pathetic, is the fact that when anyone asks you some hard questions you always attempt to fall back on your #1 defense outlined in your 1st sentence (see above). After 2+ years of writing to you and others, what good would it have been to call you. If anyone who should have been "busting their ass" to resolve this issue, it should have been you! With respect to copying the universe, I've got nothing to hide, do you???

Secondly, what I find that is unconscionable is the fact that after 2+ years of myself & the DOL inquiring about our SPD's, that as a our President / Trustee, you do not have any information as to the status and or whereabouts of the finalized Retiree and Pension SPD's. What is even more pathetic is that after all this time, you will have to ask for an update on the SPD and get back to me.

Right.... like when is that supposed to happen, in 2011? Ron, what in the hell are you and the Board of Trustee's doing when you have your Trustee's meetings? Obviously, you folks are not doing anything concerning finalizing and or mailing the Plan Participants copies of our Retiree & Pension SPD's!

Your comment about the Retiree Health Care piece, "that there is nothing to report", is a bit disingenuous to say the least. Specifically, by way of one (1)example, what is taking place with the Survivor Spouse Benefit that is outlined in the Letter of Agreement for the Retirees?

http://www.uncharted.ca/images/users/ssigurdur/retirees_letter_of_agreement.jpg

Item #2 : "Limiting surviving spouse benefits for future retirees, such as the rule applicable to the Southern California UFCW Unions & Employers Benefit Fund".

I've been told that many individuals who have opted for early retirement based on the serious issues facing our Food Pension Plan, are being told that "if" they do not retire now, they may loose our current Survivor Spouse Benefit Rule and
Item #2 (Southern Ca. Survivor Spouse Benefit Rule) will apply. Is that correct?

Assuming that information is correct, then your statement; "As for the Retiree Health Care piece I promised to let you know if anything new was happening. There is nothing to report" , would have been a bold face lie!

However, if that information is incorrect, then we have another problem of the "possibility" of misinformation being given to individuals regarding the Survivor Spouse Benefit Rule, which could have impacted their decision on early retirement?

By the way, as a suggestion, "if" Northern Ca. will soon be adopting the Southern Ca. Survivor Spouse Benefit Rule, it would be very helpful if the Board of Trustees here in Northern Ca. could provide the Plan Participants with the applicable detailed language for the So. Ca. Survivor Spouse Benefit Rule.

Maybe you could direct me to the applicable language in our Retiree / Pension SPD. Oh...., that's right, we do not have our finalized SPD's yet!

***************************************************


Below is the text of Michael Silveira's e-mail response to Ron Lind wherein he c/c'd John Briley dated Friday, April 2, 2010 @ 9:55 am:

Dear Ron,
Well said.

Thanks.
Eat well, live well, and be thankful for and share your blessings now and always.
Just me,
Mike

A happiness that is sought for ourselves alone can never be found: for a happiness that is diminished by being shared is not big enough to make us happy. (Thomas Merton)


Seriously Mike, ...... is that the best you can provide to us after 2+ years? There was no need for you to "dine and dash" with your very limited and pathetic response. Next time, pack a lunch and stay awhile! One would have thought / hoped that you would have had the courage to provide a more substantial response. Once again, we have a classic example of another individual refusing to provide any answers and or offer any explanation as to the whereabouts of our finalized Retiree / Pension SPD's.

Speaking of partnership's, here is an article that is self explanatory. Especially after reviewing the infamous Local 5 seven (7) page color coded document. Combining the two (2) documents illustrates how the UFCW & SaveMart Supermarkets have some serious issues to deal with in Negotiations in 2011.

"The UFCW, Save Mart and Their Poverty Creating Partnership"
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2009/08/20/18617542.php
Indy Bay Article, dated Thursday, August 20, 2009
By: Another Save Mart Slave

Mike, your quick response to assist Ron regarding this SPD issue, made me think about the numerous times that I had written to you and others, pertaining to WalMart's Superstore expansion for their two (2) stores here in Salinas, Ca. Unfortunately, throughout that entire time you and others remained silent. Which raises the question, WHY do you come to the aid of President Lind over the SPD issue, and not speak up about the Walmart Superstore expansion in Salinas?

Union Employer's Must Speak Up
http://www.uncharted.ca/content/view/284/35/

Mike do not be a stranger. Looking forward to your response.

****************************************************
Ron, I purposely waited a full two (2) weeks before responding to you. I wanted to give you the "benefit of the doubt" and provide you with every opportunity to respond to me in a timely manner with your answer as you indicated in your 4/2/10 e-mail.

"I will ask for an update on the SPD and get back to you"

After two (2) weeks you have failed miserably!

Unfortunately, it has become quite clear to me, that after 2+ years, you and Mr. Osterweil no longer have the ability to tell the truth!

Thank You for your time.

John Briley

Back to top profile :: pm
SharynS
Post Posted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 2:53 pm

Joined: 28 Jan 2006
Posts: 2883
Location: the 'puter
Thanks JB, I know that speaks for many. As a long time UFCW retail member myself - and as someone who has followed the case of the missing SPD(s) closely - for me that was better than maple walnut ice cream for dessert.

To President Lind and Mr. Silveira listening in; I know for fact that poster boy positions for UFCW Retail are filled at this time but hang in there, there's always next year.

ed= I must warn President Lind and Mr. Silveira that they'll be facing stiff competition from the controlling 1518 retail clump, whose genius is altering and cementing language outside the contract.
Quote:
For more information, please click here for the October 9, 2009 settlement agreement struck by mediator Mr. Foley,

as well as the March 9, 2010 supplementary settlement agreement


_________________
Free speech is the whole thing, the whole ball game. Free speech is life itself. - Salman Rushdie
Back to top profile :: pm :: e-mail :: www
John Briley
Post Posted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 4:32 pm

Joined: 21 Nov 2007
Posts: 616
SharynS wrote:
Quote:
Thanks JB, I know that speaks for many. As a long time UFCW retail member myself - and as someone who has followed the case of the missing SPD(s) closely - for me that was better than maple walnut ice cream for dessert.


You are very welcome!!!!

Attention: President Ron Lind, Mr. Jody Osterweil, our Trust Fund Administrator, Board of Trustees, et.al..... My message / goal is very simple!

Quote:
NO SPD's / NO PEACE..... NO SPD's / NO PEACE..... NO SPD's / NO PEACE..... NO SPD's / NO PEACE.....

Back to top profile :: pm
Inside Lurker
Post Posted: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:40 am

Joined: 01 Nov 2009
Posts: 99
Hi John

Thought you might be interested that a little birdie told me that the “completed Pension SPD” booklets have been floating around certain UFCW Northern California offices. Just curious have you or any of the active members you know received their copies yet?

None of the actives I’ve spoken with yet have received their copies. Why the delay Jody? More “weenie hiding” going on again?

Members need to get off their butts and call the trust fund office and demand to know where that Pension SPD is.
Back to top profile :: pm
John Briley
Post Posted: Sat Jun 05, 2010 4:41 pm

Joined: 21 Nov 2007
Posts: 616
Inside Lurker wrote:
Quote:
Thought you might be interested that a little birdie told me that the “completed Pension SPD” booklets have been floating around certain UFCW Northern California offices. Just curious have you or any of the active members you know received their copies yet?


IL...your "little birdie" is correct.

I have in my possession a current copy of the 2010 Summary Plan Description (SPD) for the UFCW Northern California Employers Joint Pension Plan .

For the record, I DID NOT receive the Food Pension SPD from Jody Osterweil, our Trust Fund Administrator as he had previously promised.

Based on everything that is taking place within our Trust Fund, specifically with our Food Pension Plan, it is unconscienable that each and every Plan Participant, Active & Retiree have not received their 2010 Food Pension Plan SPD from our Trust Fund!

Quote:
Members need to get off their butts and call the trust fund office and demand to know where that Pension SPD is.


IL...... great advice for each and every Plan Participant (Active & Retiree) to follow up on.

Unfortunately, it has become quite obvious that Jody Osterweil, our Trust Fund Administrator, has his head buried in the sand and is absolutely useless !!!!!

Including his inability for telling the truth!

To illustrate my point concerning our Trust Fund Administrator, Mr. Jody Osterweil:



BTW.... it is very important to note that the Retiree Medical Plan SPD is still MIA!!!
Back to top profile :: pm
Laboryes
Post Posted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 1:59 pm

Joined: 29 Jan 2006
Posts: 1959
John Briley wrote:

To illustrate my point concerning our Trust Fund Administrator, Mr. Jody Osterweil:


Sorry JB but I have to disagree! Osterweil's problem is more like this...



_________________
"When people refuse to obey, then democracy comes alive."
Howard Zinn
Back to top profile :: pm
SharynS
Post Posted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 2:22 pm

Joined: 28 Jan 2006
Posts: 2883
Location: the 'puter
hey what a coincidence, I know both those guys. Fact is one of them looks like the guy who ran ufcw local 1518 (intotheground). Small bloody world eh.

_________________
Free speech is the whole thing, the whole ball game. Free speech is life itself. - Salman Rushdie
Back to top profile :: pm :: e-mail :: www
John Briley
Post Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2011 10:08 pm

Joined: 21 Nov 2007
Posts: 616
Quote:
As a Plan Participant for over forty (40) years I've had the privilege to work with many outstanding Trust Fund Administrator's and Trustees who genuinely cared about all of the Plan Participants both Active and Retirees not some of the time but all of the time!

To this day, there are many dedicated and caring Trust Fund Employee's (Roseville & Walnut Creek) who go out of their way on a daily basis to provide all of the Plan Participants (Actives & Retirees) with assistance and compassion in resolving any problem(s) that they may have.

To the extent that Mr. Osterweil, in the capacity as our Trust Fund Administrator,
not having the "common decency" and or the "professional courtesy" to respond to any Plan Participant (Active or Retiree) in a timely manner is unconscionable and inexcusable!

Now is the time for our Union & Employer Trustees to demonstrate some much needed Leadership and say good-bye to Mr. Osterweil once and for all. In my opinion, Mr. Osterweil, has failed miserably as our Trust Fund Administrator over these past years!



I just received some very interesting information as it pertains to our UFCW Trust Fund, here in Northern California.

The Trustees accepted the resignation of Trust Fund Administrator, Jody Osterweil last week. He will be moving on to another position in the Benefits Administration Field.

Quote:
The Trustees have appointed former Save Mart Representative Rick Silva as the new Administrator. Rick Silva has an MBA, is knowledgeable of multiple benefit topics and is an expert in HR and other administrative issues.


So where did Rick Silva come from?????

Quote:
A restructuring at Save Mart, has resulted in the resignations of Mike Silveira and Rick Silva, the two primary labor relations spokepersons for the Company.


I am very concerned / interested as to how Mr. Silva will perform as our new Trust Fund Administrator representing our Active / Retiree Plan Participants?

Only time will tell?????
Back to top profile :: pm
John Briley
Post Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2011 5:05 pm

Joined: 21 Nov 2007
Posts: 616
Quote:
Contact Information for our new Trust Fund Administrator.

Rick Silva

1.925.746.7575 ext.7575

rsilva@ufcwtrust.com

Back to top profile :: pm
Home arrow Forums arrow Your Union arrow UFCW & Employers Trust Fund Participant Blow Off?
Page 5 of 5
page: prev  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Display posts from previous:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group