Home
Forums
Your Union
UFCW & Employers Trust Fund Participant Blow Off?
Forums
Your Union
UFCW & Employers Trust Fund Participant Blow Off?
UFCW & Employers Trust Fund Participant Blow Off?
| page: prev 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 next | |
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
| John Briley |
|
|
Joined: 21 Nov 2007 Posts: 616 |
Laboryes wrote: Quote: What your telling us is that Osterweil sent you a 4 inch package of documents regarding our Health & Welfare and our retirement plan, none of which can be used because there so out dated that none pertain to what’s going on with Health & welfare and retiree issues “TODAY”????
Please correct me if I’m wrong JB, but that’s what I’m reading!!! Laboryes... let me break down for you what documents were sent to me. The documents were attached to four separate SPD's. Two SPD's for the Bay & Two SPD's for the Valley. Each SPD had a cover sheet, outlining the specific "current notice", the date of the "currrent notice" and the actual "current notice" document for the following: 1. BAY AREA H&W FOR ACTIVES. 2. BAY AREA H&W FOR RETIREES. 3. VALLEY H&W FOR ACTIVES. 4. VALLEY H&W FOR RETIREES. The problem with all of the above is the fact that these documents DO NOT reflect a current and updated H&W SPD for our newly Merged H&W Trust Fund Plan. If any Plan Participant (Active & Retiree) has been fortunate to have ever received an SPD and or saved all of the "current notices" over they years, how in the world can anyone make "heads or tails" out of all the numerous documents / changes for our H&W Plans? Maybe the most simplistic approach is to PDF the documents in question, so we can post them @ uncharted.ca I will attempt to get that accomplished. |
| Back to top | profile :: pm |
| Laboryes |
|
|
Joined: 29 Jan 2006 Posts: 1959 |
OH DEAR!!! It looks like Allison Campos may have received "another email" from our brother Briley!
Well technically it was sent to our Trust Fund Administrator, Mr. Jody Osterweil but Allison was included in the email... Quote: Hello Jody Osterweil ---- I wanted to personally thank you for sending me the old Bay and Valley active and retiree SPD's, including all of the current notices pertaining to said SPD's.. I received the packet on Monday, November 16, 2009.
As we are all aware of and for the record, I continue to request a copy of our current and updated H&W SPD. In your November 13, 2009 letter to me, you indicated that the Plan professionals along with staff are currently working on a new and consolidated version of an SPD that reflects the merger of the Bay and Northern California (Valley) Plans into the UFCW & employers Benefit Trust, "UEBT". I'm assuming that said H&W SPD will also have all of the applicable retiree information enclosed? Is that correct? Can you provide me with an approximate date when you believe that this H&W SPD will be completed and when I can expect to receive my copy? Additionally, as we are all aware of and for the record, I continue to request a copy of our current and updated Food Pension SPD. Your 11/13/09 doesn't reflect any information about the status of said SPD. In previous E-Mails, I've specifically requested copies of our current and updated H&W SPD, including a copy of our current and updated Food Pension SPD. Can you provide me with a status update as to the completion date of said Food Pension SPD? Jody & Allison, please let me know if this E-Mail is not acceptable as to a "formal request" pertaining to requesting a current and updated H&W and Food Pension SPD. I will be more than happy to provide you with a formal written letter requesting the above in the event you do not accept this E-Mail as a formal request. I've also c/c'd Ron Lind, our Local Union President @ UFCW Local 5, who I believe is a Trustee on both the H&W and Food Pension Trust Funds. Ron, as we have discussed previously, it is time for this entire matter to be resolved once and for all! Each and every Plan Participant (active & retiree) is entitled to a current and updated H&W and Food Pension SPD immediately. As our President and a Trustee, I know you can make that happen! If you should have any questions or require any additional information please feel free to contact me @ anytime. Thank You John Briley _________________ "When people refuse to obey, then democracy comes alive." Howard Zinn |
| Back to top | profile :: pm |
| Laboryes |
|
|
Joined: 29 Jan 2006 Posts: 1959 |
Damn JB your like a Pit Bull when you get focused on an issue! You’d think Osterweil would just give you what your entitled to just to get you off his back? Go get em JB!
_________________ "When people refuse to obey, then democracy comes alive." Howard Zinn |
| Back to top | profile :: pm |
| John Briley |
|
|
Joined: 21 Nov 2007 Posts: 616 |
Laboryes wrote: Quote: Damn JB your like a Pit Bull when you get focused on an issue! You’d think Osterweil would just give you what your entitled to just to get you off his back?
Laboryes....... We will see...... As a retiree, I've got nothing but time!!!!!! |
| Back to top | profile :: pm |
| Laboryes |
|
|
Joined: 29 Jan 2006 Posts: 1959 |
The Pit Bull(JB) strikes again.........
Quote: Date: Friday, November 20, 2009, 9:54 AM
Hello Jody Osterweil ----- As a follow up to my E-Mail on Wednesday, 11/18/09 (attached) and after reviewing a portion of the documents that you have provided to me, there is some discrepancies that I've found & I need some clarification / explanation from you. It appears that there "may" be several years of "current notices" that are missing from the documents that you have recently provided to me. By way of an example, the clarification I seek is a result from reviewing the two (2) UFCW Bay Area Health and Welfare SPD's provided for actives and retirees. Including the cover sheets which outlines the enclosure titles and the issue dates of said "current notices". Point 1 ---- The front cover of the Bay Area SPD appears to be recently updated with the address & phone numbers of our current Trust Fund Office @ 1277 Treat Blvd. in Walnut Creek. If that in fact took place, why was the front cover updated and not the entire SPD updated at the same time? Point 2 ---- The reason I believe that the cover has been recently updated, is the fact if you turn to page 2 in both of the Bay Area SPD's, you will notice the respective Employer and Union Trustees listed for said Bay Area H&W Plan. For the record, most of the Employer & Union Trustees were not around to attend Trust Fund Meetings @ the Treat Blvd. address following our move from our Wiget Lane. Based on that information, How is it possible for those Trustees to show up in the Bay Area H&W SPD's with our current Trust Fund Address located on Treat Blvd. Additionally, you will note @ the top of the page 2 in said SPD, the reference to the correct address @ the time for our Trust Fund Office. At the time this SPD was originally printed, our Trust Fund address was 190 North Wiget Lane, in Walnut Creek. Point 3 --- If you turn to the back of said SPD you will note a reference to what appears to be a REV 7/92. Jody if you would clarify this for me. Does REV 7/92 reflect that this SPD was revised back in July 1992? If that is correct, then this Bay Area H&W SPD "allegedly" hasn't been updated in over 17 years? If that isn't correct Jody, when was the last time that the Bay Area H&W SPD has been updated? Allison Campos, Lorrie Culp & Carrie Grove ---- what is the Law pertaining to the amount of time a SPD is allowed to "hang in limbo" before being required to be updated by our Trust Fund / Trustees? If the above is correct, is 17+ years an acceptable amount of time without updating our SPD? Point 4 --- Assuming that July of 1992 was the last time the Bay Area SPD has been updated, then I would turn your attention to the the two (2 Bay Area H&W SPD's including the cover sheets that you have already provided me. Once again, assuming that the last time said Bay Area H&W SPD was updated in 7/92, then what has happened to all of the "current notices" from July 1992 to February 1998 for actives and retirees. That represents over 5 1/2 years of " current notices" that appear to be missing from the documents you have already provided to me? Jody can you provide me with clarification and or an explanation to the "alleged" missing "current notices" form July 1992 to February 1998? Was this an oversight or do we (Trust Fund Office) not have the "current notices" for that period of time? For the record, "if" I am correct regarding the 5 1/2 years of "alleged" missing "current notices," then I would respectively request that the Trust Fund send me those specific documents in question ASAP. Point 5 ---- Can you provide me with a clarification / explanation as to why the cover sheets that are attached to the Bay & Valley SPD's for (actives & retirees), appear to missing some "current notice" documents for the Bay Area H&W SPD for Retirees? By way of an example, please refer to the issue dates on the following cover sheets for the Valley H&W SPD for (actives & retirees) and the Bay SPD for (actives). You will note the issue date of July 2009 as the last entry for those 3 groups. However, when you review the cover sheet for the Bay SPD for retirees, you will note the issue date of January 2009. It appears that once again we have some documents from January 2009 to July 2009 that "allegedly" may be missing from the Bay Area H&W SPD for retirees. For the record, "if" I am correct regarding the 5 months of "alleged" missing "current notices," then I would respectively request that the Trust Fund send me those specific documents in question ASAP. ---------------------------------------------- In contrast, if you examine the two (2) Valley SPD's for (actives & retirees) you will note that there doesn't appear to be any discrepancies. Point 1 ---- On the front cover of the Valley H&W SPD you will note the date of January 2001 which reflects the last time this SPD was revised. Point 2 --- Reviewing the cover sheets you will note that entry of August 2001 for the "current notices" through July 2009 in both cover sheets. ------------------------------------------------ Jody Osterweil, Allison Campos, Lorrie Culp & Carrie Grove I am looking forward to your clarification / explanation concerning these issues for me ASAP. Jody & Allison, once again, please let me know if this E-Mail is not acceptable as to a "formal request" pertaining to the questions I've raised above. I will be more than happy to provide you with a formal written letter requesting the above in the event you do not accept this E-Mail as a formal request. Allison Campos (DOL)----- I've attempted to outline my questions and concerns as coherently as possible. However, I realize that all of this may be confusing. Therefore, I would like to suggest the possibility of the two of us meeting to discuss all of the above in more detail. Please let me know your availability ASAP. If anyone should have any questions or require any additional information please feel free to contact me @ anytime. In closing, as a current Retiree and a Plan Participant for over 38 years, I do expect someone within our Trust Fund to provide me with some answers with respect to the questions and concerns I've raised in this E-Mail. I sincerely hope that I do not have to wait another 2 years for an answer from our Trust Fund. Once again thank you in advance for your immediate attention to my request. Looking forward to your response. John Briley Looks like this email not only went to Osterweil & Allison Campos but it was cc'd to Local 5 President Ron Lind and a few attorneys as well! No one of this bunch can ever claim they didn't know what was going on! Briley...it would be my guess that your not liked very well in the circle of the UFCW troughers? _________________ "When people refuse to obey, then democracy comes alive." Howard Zinn |
| Back to top | profile :: pm |
| SharynS |
|
|
Joined: 28 Jan 2006 Posts: 2883 Location: the 'puter |
How is it the Trust caretakers get to simply ignore the law and the Authorities sit by and does nothing? The DOL (Ms. Campos) should be all over this like white on rice. A crime has been committed and reported and then nothing.
How different is the DOL's obvious blind eye from cops supplying the get away car for a daylight robbery? It does show what little regard the labour process and it's puppets have for the people trapped inside. _________________ Free speech is the whole thing, the whole ball game. Free speech is life itself. - Salman Rushdie |
| Back to top | profile :: pm :: e-mail :: www |
| Inside Lurker |
|
|
Joined: 01 Nov 2009 Posts: 99 |
SharynS wrote: The DOL (Ms. Campos) should be all over this like white on rice. A crime has been committed and reported and then nothing.
John may I make a suggestion? If you feel the DOL’s Ms. Campos isn’t doing her job and also has failed to supply you with her supervisors name and contact info maybe you should consider writing a certified letter of complaint to Ms. Campos big boss Hilda L. Solis Couldn't hurt to put Washington DC on notice that your serious about this issue. Here's where you'd want to send the letter if you decide to go this route. Secretary of Labor Hilda L. Solis U.S. Department of Labor 200 Constitution Ave., NW Washington, DC 20210 (202) 693-6000 |
| Back to top | profile :: pm |
| Laboryes |
|
|
Joined: 29 Jan 2006 Posts: 1959 |
Here’s an interesting twist gang!
A San Francisco Supervisor by the name of David Campos District 9 popped up during a google search on "Allison Campos" I wonder......any relation to our DOL's Allison Campos???? Check it out... http://www.fogcityjournal.com/wordpress/2009/03/10/stay-tuned-with-hope-johnson-4/ Maybe our brother Sable could fill us in on this David Campos? Bill, anything??? _________________ "When people refuse to obey, then democracy comes alive." Howard Zinn |
| Back to top | profile :: pm |
| Bill Sable |
|
|
Joined: 14 Feb 2009 Posts: 259 |
Put your concerns aside, my Brother. "Campos" is a common enough name, especially in SF. Further, David Campos is the newly elected supervisor from the district neighboring my own. Met him campaigning in front of the Mission St. Safeway...had a conversation and mentioned that I couldn't vote from him as I live in Vis Valley. Pity. He is a protege (if you will) of Chris Daly, who is not exactly the kind of guy to go along with (or tolerate) the DOL incompetence/stonewalling the Ms. Campos is evidently fond of.
|
| Back to top | profile :: pm |
| Laboryes |
|
|
Joined: 29 Jan 2006 Posts: 1959 |
Thanks for the info Bill! I knew you'd know.
_________________ "When people refuse to obey, then democracy comes alive." Howard Zinn |
| Back to top | profile :: pm |
| Laboryes |
|
|
Joined: 29 Jan 2006 Posts: 1959 |
JB, any response from Osterweil or Campos regarding your last email?
If not hold their feet to the fire JB and send that certified letter to the head of the DOL, Hilda Solis. At this point why not?It couldn't hurt! _________________ "When people refuse to obey, then democracy comes alive." Howard Zinn |
| Back to top | profile :: pm |
| SharynS |
|
|
Joined: 28 Jan 2006 Posts: 2883 Location: the 'puter |
Quote: ...any response from Osterweil or Campos _________________ Free speech is the whole thing, the whole ball game. Free speech is life itself. - Salman Rushdie |
| Back to top | profile :: pm :: e-mail :: www |
| Laboryes |
|
|
Joined: 29 Jan 2006 Posts: 1959 |
Will the hypocrisy never end?
Not quite sure at this point if Jody Osterweil and the Nor Cal Trust Fund Trustees are just stupid or arrogant? I’ll let you all decide..... One thing is for sure, Briley is at a boiling point and has come out in the ring swinging! Briley’s last email communication with Trust Fund administrator Jody Osterweil..... Quote: Date: Friday, December 18, 2009, 11:11 AM
Hello Jody Osterweil ---- On Thursday, December 17, 2009 I received by U.S. Mail, copies of the following Summary Annual Reports from our Trust Fund. 1. UFCW - BAY AREA HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST FUND 2. UFCW - NORTHERN CALIFORNIA FOOD EMPLOYERS JOINT INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNT PLAN Please be advised that as outlined in both Summary Annual Reports I am herby requesting copies of the full annual report for both Reports ASAP. Additionally, I have some specific comments / questions concerning both documents. First ----- Jody, I will direct my first comment to you and the Board of Trustees / Plan Professionals concerning the following paragraph found in the Summary Annual Report for the UFCW - Bay Area Health and Welfare Trust Fund: "BENEFITS AND ELIGIBILITY RULES WILL CHANGE FROM TIME TO TIME. RETIREE BENEFITS DIFFER FROM ACTIVE EMPLOYEE BENEFITS AND ALSO CAN BE CHANGED OR ELIMINATED AT ANY TIME. BE SURE TO USE THE MOST RECENT PLAN BOOKLET AND TO READ ANY SPECIAL NOTICES ABOUT COVERAGE. DO NOT RELY ON OUTDATED INFORMATION. IF YOU LOSE YOUR COVERAGE YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO CONTINUE IT BY MAKING SELF PAYMENTS. CONSULT YOUR BOOKLET OR THE PLAN OFFICE FOR DETAILS." Seriously Jody, do you or the Board of Trustees / Plan Professionals have any idea and or any clue as to what you send out to the Plan Participants? For over two (2) years now I've been trying to obtain a current and updated H&W Plan SPD and I'm still waiting! More to the point, you didn't have the common decency and or the professional courtesy to respond to any of my E-Mails, letters, etc., for over two (2) years. It was until I was forced to reach out to the DOL that you were finally forced to respond to me by the DOL. Yet, you and the Board of Trustees / Plan Professionals up in Walnut Creek write down meaningless words / sentences instructing Plan Participants to "BE SURE TO USE THE MOST RECENT PLAN BOOKLET AND TO READ ANY SPECIAL NOTICES ABOUT COVERAGE. DO NOT RELY ON OUTDATED INFORMATION." When in fact, as you & the Board of Trustees / Plan Professionals are fully aware of, there isn't a recent Plan Booklet available to any Bay Area H&W Plan Participant and or any Plan Participant since the merger between the Valley and Bay H&W Plans back in 2007 / 2008! Talk about hypocrisy, since one of these Summary Annual Reports deals specifically with the Bay Area H&W Health and Welfare Plan and as you are clearly aware of, the last time the Bay Area H&W SPD was updated was on or about July of 1992! Now lets talk about the MOST RECENT PLAN BOOKLET!!!! We are now over 19 years since the BAY AREA SPD has been updated and still waiting! Secondly, Jody, I will direct my question to you and the Board of Trustees / Plan Professionals concerning the following paragraph found in the Summary Annual Report for the UFCW - Northern California Food Employer's Joint Individual Account Plan: "THE PLAN HAD TOTAL INCOME OF $(61,011,739), INCLUDING EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTIONS OF $201,606, LOSS ON THE SALE OF INVESTMENTS OF $22,017,410, AND LOSSES FROM INVESTMENTS OF $39,195,935". If my memory serves me correctly, it was my understanding that back in 2004 the Employer's quit paying into the IAP. If that is correct, would you be so kind to explain to me why would any Employer continue to make contributions into the IAP for 2008? I'm confused with this entry and I would appreciate an explanation. Additionally, please identify who the Employer's are? Could you also identify for me if any Employer(s) made any Contributions into the IAP (dollar amounts) for the years 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007? If you should have any questions or require any additional information please feel free to contact me @ anytime. I reserve my right to ask further questions once I receive both of my copies of the full annual reports as outlined above. Thank You Happy Holidays John Briley _________________ "When people refuse to obey, then democracy comes alive." Howard Zinn |
| Back to top | profile :: pm |
| Inside Lurker |
|
|
Joined: 01 Nov 2009 Posts: 99 |
Quote: First ----- Jody, I will direct my first comment to you and the Board of Trustees / Plan Professionals concerning the following paragraph found in the Summary Annual Report for the UFCW - Bay Area Health and Welfare Trust Fund: Assuming there are any UFCW members here in Northern California who care about any of this(which I’m starting to have my doubts) here is a complete list of the both the employer and Union Trustees for the UFCW & Employers Benefit Trust Fund Please notice who “controls the majority” on the union side. Employer Trustees: 1. Brent Bohn ---- Albertson's Inc. 2. Dave Cuesta --- Raley's Supermarkets 3. James V. Morgan --- Safeway, Inc. 4. Rick Silva --- Save Mart Supermarkets 5. W. Robert Vallon -- Food employers Council, Inc. Union Trustees: 1. Michael A. Borstel ---- UFCW Local 101 2. Terry Gonzales --- UFCW Local 5 3. Jerry Hunsucker --- UFCW 8 -Golden State 4. Ron Lind --- UFCW Local 5 5. Jacques S. Loveall --- UFCW 8 -Golden State 6. Sheryl Percell --- UFCW 8 - Golden State 7. Michael Sharpe --- UFCW Local 648 8. Michael F. Tursky --- UFCW 8 - Golden State 9. Kirk L. Vogt --- UFCW 8 -Golden State It would be interesting if we could come up with contact information(E-mail and phone number) for each Trustee. Can anyone help out on that? |
| Back to top | profile :: pm |
| SharynS |
|
|
Joined: 28 Jan 2006 Posts: 2883 Location: the 'puter |
Aside from the obvious Local 8 control of the "union side" - what is with the union v. employer trustee imbalance - nine (9) to five (5)? Not to mention that a 14 member board is somewhat unusual to begin with.
It's interesting that employers contributing to these funds would so readily - and silently - give up any control over them. Makes one wonder what assurances were traded to arrive at such an arrangement where employers do all the contributing and union - more specifically local 8 - does all the controlling. _________________ Free speech is the whole thing, the whole ball game. Free speech is life itself. - Salman Rushdie |
| Back to top | profile :: pm :: e-mail :: www |
Home
Forums
Your Union
UFCW & Employers Trust Fund Participant Blow Off?
Forums
Your Union
UFCW & Employers Trust Fund Participant Blow Off?
|
Page 2 of 5
page: prev 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 next |
||