Home arrow Forums arrow The Lounge arrow Boxing, Amateur and Pro

Boxing, Amateur and Pro

page: prev  1, 2, 3  next
Display posts from previous:
Author Message
Mulligan
Post Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2008 9:55 pm

Joined: 04 Feb 2006
Posts: 358
Location: Ground Zero
But Sig, we’re not talking about “out on the street.” Try and stay on track here. BZelley started the thread by specifying legalized boxing –pro or amateur. The fact is that under given state laws and conditions –boxing in a ring for money, or not for money, is legal.

Quote:
…inconsistency, the myth, the manipulation


The inconsistency of what? Either it is or it isn’t legal. Where’s the inconsistency? If you fight on the street you get arrested. If you fight in a legal ring, you participate in a sporting event. If there’s a public demand for pro or amateur boxing events and you have what it takes to box an opponent in those events, then it’s your choice whether or not you actually do or don’t.

Manipulation? Are you being manipulated when you hire on to Safeway because Safeway provides food in exchange for money according to public demand? No, you need a job to support yourself and your family. If you’re qualified to work in a grocery store, Safeway (or whatever) can supply that job to you according to the demand for labor. You get a job out of the deal if there is a demand for labor.

Quote:
…relevant rule which outright outlaws this archaic ritual…


That’s a matter of subjectivity on your part. To you it’s an “archaic ritual.” To lots of other people it’s a public sport that is legally regulated like all other legitimate sports.
Back to top profile :: pm
SharynS
Post Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2008 10:27 pm

Joined: 28 Jan 2006
Posts: 2883
Location: the 'puter
Quote:
If you fight on the street you get arrested.
Quote:
If you fight in a legal ring, you participate in a sporting event
^^No inconsistencies^^?

Please, the law and it's function are by default, rooted in them. I'll grant you it's not easy to wrap our heads around the concept. If you accept law as all encompassing and flawless perhaps but to the best of my knowledge it's not.
Quote:
...Any discussion of boxing for money falls by the wayside when it comes to
amateur boxing. Since the formation of CABA (Boxing Canada) there have been major improvements in safety standards...
Pop out another rule and all is well? Pop out another 'rule' and discussion "falls by the wayside"? Amazing! And you felt nothing? No unexplained holes, antennae, no probes protruding anywhere? Little flickering lights, cords, strings, anything? Laughing

_________________
Free speech is the whole thing, the whole ball game. Free speech is life itself. - Salman Rushdie
Back to top profile :: pm :: e-mail :: www
BZelley
Post Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 6:25 am

Joined: 05 Dec 2008
Posts: 26
Location: Canada
Aside from all the mumbo jumbo regarding Siggy's off topic
rants about crime and non-ring activity, there is much to say about
professional boxing's social role relating to various ethnic groups
progress in boxing and society. In the USA we can follow the progress of the Irish and their early champions such as John L. Sullivan, Mike O'dowd,
or Jack McAuliffe. Then there were those great J ewish boxers such as
Benny Leonard and Barney Ross followed by Italian-Americans
such as Tony Canzoneri, Rocky Kansas and others.
Back to top profile :: pm
BZelley
Post Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 6:37 am

Joined: 05 Dec 2008
Posts: 26
Location: Canada
Another few lines from "Counterpunch for boxing"
as reported in the "Times-Colonist":

"The sport of amateur boxing may not be the choice for
middle-class boys of Greater Victoria, but for many
disadvanged youth-in such places as East Los Angeles..._
amateur boxing provides an important door for many
to escape from poverty and despair, street gangs and crime, and the
artificial high of acceptance through drugs and alcohol.
The values that may be obtained from amateur boxing include
self-respect and pride, respect for authority, and respect and
compassion for others." - Brian Zelley (1992)Idea
Back to top profile :: pm
BZelley
Post Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:07 am

Joined: 05 Dec 2008
Posts: 26
Location: Canada
Mulligan wrote:
But Sig, we’re not talking about “out on the street.” Try and stay on track here. BZelley started the thread by specifying legalized boxing –pro or amateur. The fact is that under given state laws and conditions –boxing in a ring for money, or not for money, is legal.




Quote:
…relevant rule which outright outlaws this archaic ritual…


That’s a matter of subjectivity on your part. To you it’s an “archaic ritual.” To lots of other people it’s a public sport that is legally regulated like all other legitimate sports.


Mulligan
You scored a knockout punch with your fast and accurate understanding
of the purpose of this thread

I was inspired to add this thread after reading the details of Dick Findlay's
problems. As I boxed in some of the same tournaments as Findlay, I was
kind of shocked at his circumstances from 1988 to recent years.

We can be proud of Findlay representing British Columbia and Canada
in many International competitions, but how proud can we be of those
responsible for the current circumstances Question

I would hope that others would respect this thread with positive comments
concerning the positive aspects of boxing. Some fine Canadians hve
been involved in the sport such as the late great Tommy Douglas.
I could mention many more high profile Canadians and Americans.

Any poster, can bash an occupation or a leisure activity, but it takes
class to praise others for their achievements. Idea Arrow
We can all try to follow that Idea bright and positive path Arrow
Back to top profile :: pm
SharynS
Post Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 1:32 pm

Joined: 28 Jan 2006
Posts: 2883
Location: the 'puter
Relax bz, no-one is bashing anyone, if you'd actually taken the time to read you would know that. But ftr: it's just as easy to bash an idea if you don't understand it and/or fear it.

It's a basic concept, we need to clear away the confusion before anything of human value can or will emerge. We believe violence is a sport, rape can be consensual. We make victims pay for crime. We think 5 yrs is penance for a life taken. We think a criminal wearing rags is more dangerous than a criminal in a suit...the list is long. And, because it's written in exact text in a fucking log book somewhere, we think that it must be so - that's all there is.

Here's the thing, if we can get our heads out of our asses on at least a few conflicting messages, there's hope. I thought this was as good a thread as any to bring it up, fear not.

_________________
Free speech is the whole thing, the whole ball game. Free speech is life itself. - Salman Rushdie
Back to top profile :: pm :: e-mail :: www
atuuschaaw
Post Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 2:33 pm

Joined: 29 Jan 2006
Posts: 780
Location: an ahwangan
Welcome to the fray BZ!

Quote:
"The sport of amateur boxing may not be the choice for middle-class boys of Greater Victoria, but for many
disadvanged youth-in such places as East Los Angeles..._amateur boxing provides an important door for many to escape from poverty and despair, street gangs and crime, and the artificial high of acceptance through drugs and alcohol. The values that may be obtained from amateur boxing include self-respect and pride, respect for authority, and respect and compassion for others." - Brian Zelley (1992)


Damn right! Although I think the gladiatorial tradition hosted the ultimate games in regards to spectator sports! Laughing

Pugilism has a long history here on Earth, and some say that Homer even mentions it in what some scholars believe to be the oldest work of literature in the Greek language...his renown Iliad. The importance of this sport can be seen throughout history. As far back as the 1st Century BC, ancient Roman boxers who were usually criminals and slaves, used the sport as a way out, and hoped to become champions and gain their freedom. So boxing gave them a way to avoid the horrors of the world into which they were unfortunately born. So I guess there hasn't been a lot of change over 2000 years...people continue to find themselves hopelessly entangled in poverty and all the inhuman dignity that goes along with that title. Even entire educational systems revolve around spectator sports and depend on the popularity of those sports rather than scholastic achievements for their funding. We seem to have come a long way without ever moving anywhere!

I praise those achievements made by the athlete...the fighter. Although, I have much more praise for those who have somehow managed to use their intellect to fight their way out of hopelessness, rather than those who can put a good combination together and have the stamina to go 12 rounds!

_________________
"Speaking the truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." George Orwell
Back to top profile :: pm :: e-mail :: www
SharynS
Post Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 3:02 pm

Joined: 28 Jan 2006
Posts: 2883
Location: the 'puter
Bingo AT! Ooops - KO AT!

It's one thing to admire said persons because they honed a human skill to it's max and quite another to admire said persons for slaying the dragon to gain freedom. And in the name of a country no less. The way the "sporting" system is set they don't even warrant the credit. That's up for grabs with crumbs to the victim. Either way, it's a bit of a vicarious and self-serving ideology if you ask me. Not to mention it's laden in hypocrisy. There are some huge discrepancies in the country is behind you rhetoric, just ask Findlay.

Slay the dragon and go free! We are so there eh. I know that some of these new ideas are way out there for you BZ and that's alright. What you have to remember is that this is the internet, expect it to happen.

_________________
Free speech is the whole thing, the whole ball game. Free speech is life itself. - Salman Rushdie
Back to top profile :: pm :: e-mail :: www
BZelley
Post Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 2:46 am

Joined: 05 Dec 2008
Posts: 26
Location: Canada
siggy wrote:
Relax bz, no-one is bashing anyone, if you'd actually taken the time to read you would know that. But ftr: it's just as easy to bash an idea if you don't understand it and/or fear it.


Here's the thing, if we can get our heads out of our asses on at least a few conflicting messages, there's hope. I thought this was as good a thread as any to bring it up, fear not.


Of course this is not a Sixties style love-in where folks
are sitting around with flowers in their hair, smoking funny cigarettes and
and dancing to "tiptoe through the tulips" and grooving to the same tunes.

It is a boxing thread,where folks are expected to trade verbal blows
in support of or support against some of the controversial issues
be it safety in boxing, job opportunities in pro boxing, and
available benefits such as health care and pensions.

Concerning amateur boxing, most folks involved past and present
are not looking for a pot full of gold at the end of the
boxing rainbow. Only a select few will receive International
fame and glory. But, for most that may receive a small amount
of fame in their own hometown, nothing lasts forever.
For those seeking fame and glory they should recall the
words of the late singer songwriter PHIL OCHS from the Sixties:
"IT ALL FADES SO QUICKLY, LIKE A SUNNY SUMMER'S DAY..."
Idea
Back to top profile :: pm
BZelley
Post Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 9:06 am

Joined: 05 Dec 2008
Posts: 26
Location: Canada
Mulligan wrote:
But Sig, we’re not talking about “out on the street.” Try and stay on track here. BZelley started the thread by specifying legalized boxing –pro or amateur. The fact is that under given state laws and conditions –boxing in a ring for money, or not for money, is legal.

Quote:
…relevant rule which outright outlaws this archaic ritual…


That’s a matter of subjectivity on your part. To you it’s an “archaic ritual.” To lots of other people it’s a public sport that is legally regulated like all other legitimate sports.


Sometimes it might be smart to go beyond the basic aspects of boxing and
consider the lessons that can be applied for your regular union worker
on the shop floor.

As a general rule, a boxer is expected to perform his or her best
with a minimum of complications. However, there are some important safeguards that the boxer must count on such as his manager, trainers
and ring cornerman. Likewise, your everyday worker relies on
their union representatives from shop steward to union leaders
to step forward in a timely fashion to correct any problems that the
worker is facing on the job or dealing with the employers on key
issues.

Nothing is perfect, sometimes those responsible to protect the safety and best interest of the boxer fall short with the biggest loser being the boxer.
Likewise, no shop steward or union boss is perfect, and from time-to-time
they need to be educated or replaced if they fail to use all necessary steps to protect their brothers and sisters in critical situations.

Be it boxers or union workers, when others are getting a slice of their pie,
those representatives need to step-up to the stove and produce. Embarassed
Back to top profile :: pm
SharynS
Post Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 3:30 pm

Joined: 28 Jan 2006
Posts: 2883
Location: the 'puter
So boxing is like a hazardous job with rigorous safety standards? The following definition possibly helps explain where "sport" in said job is and/or where the misnomer possibly drew it's momentum.
Quote:
# An active pastime; recreation.

2. An object of mockery, jest, or play: treated our interests as sport.
Because we know the object is the boxer, then that would put the sport associated with the job of boxing with spectator_ship. Interesting, a little twist of a message and a hazardous task - a crime by street standards - becomes a sport.

_________________
Free speech is the whole thing, the whole ball game. Free speech is life itself. - Salman Rushdie
Back to top profile :: pm :: e-mail :: www
BZelley
Post Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2008 5:36 am

Joined: 05 Dec 2008
Posts: 26
Location: Canada
[quote="siggy"]So boxing is like a hazardous job with rigorous safety standards? The following definition possibly helps explain where "sport" in said job is and/or where the misnomer possibly drew it's momentum.[quote]

Clearly, one must make a distinction between amateur boxing (a pastime
or recreation) and pro boxing (a job).

Of course a few folks over the years have reached the top
in the recreation of amateur boxing and the long and winding
road of professional boxing. Some obvious examples include
Jackie Fields, Fidel LaBarba, Pascual Perez, Floyd Patterson,
and Lennox Lewis. Very Happy Arrow Some roads lead to the top
while others lead to nowhere. The question is how far do we go down the road that we travel Question Idea or does it matter, and should we just enjoy the ride Question
Back to top profile :: pm
BZelley
Post Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 10:40 am

Joined: 05 Dec 2008
Posts: 26
Location: Canada
Pick any big city and one can find violence on the street such as Chicago.
A few examples include 1886 Haymarket Riot, the 1917 Race Riots
and the 1968 Democratic Convention and the noted Chicago Seven.
Then of course there were those heated days of bootlegging and brawls
during those Al Capone days.

Then there was boxing. Chicago became the first when the
Chicago Tribune hosted the first Golden Gloves tournament in 1926.
New York quickly followed in 1927 and the rest is history.

In the sometimes brutal sport of professional boxing, Chicago
was the site of controversy and great fights. Take the case when
Gene Tunney shocked the world with his famous victory over
Jack (the Manassa Mauler) Dempsey in 1925. Fast forward to 1947,
and it was the second of the three middleweight wars between
Tony (Man of Steel) Zale and New York's Rocky Graziano
(noted for the movie "Somebody Up There Likes Me" when Graziano
played by Paul Newman won the title in Chicago in 1947).

Chicago also was the site of two great Sugar Ray Robinson
middleweight wars when he stopped Gene Fullmer at
the Chicago Stadium in 1957 and outpointed the warrior
Carmen Basilio in 1958.

And who could forget the shocker when Charles (Sonny) Liston
stopped two time heavyweight champion Floyd Patterson in
one round at Chicago's Comisky Park in 1962.

Fast forward to 2008, and there has been some interesting Politics
in Chicago wuth the election of Barack Obama. If one was to select one boxer to compare to the impact of Obama around the world, the first and best likely
candidate would be Muhammed Ali (aka Cassius Clay).
Back to top profile :: pm
BZelley
Post Posted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 12:33 am

Joined: 05 Dec 2008
Posts: 26
Location: Canada
AS a follow-up, a thread as been added in the
Amateur & Professional Boxing group site at Facebook.
with a link to :The Dick Findlay Story"
Back to top profile :: pm
SharynS
Post Posted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 12:57 am

Joined: 28 Jan 2006
Posts: 2883
Location: the 'puter
Very cool BZ, did you do that?

To save a wild FB search, here's the FB Am and pro boxing link.

_________________
Free speech is the whole thing, the whole ball game. Free speech is life itself. - Salman Rushdie
Back to top profile :: pm :: e-mail :: www
Home arrow Forums arrow The Lounge arrow Boxing, Amateur and Pro
Page 2 of 3
page: prev  1, 2, 3  next
Display posts from previous:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group